The Anthropocene is almost (maybe) official. It is man’s own
epoch. Finally we have reached a stage in our development where we are no
longer at the mercy of nature; instead, nature is at the mercy of us.
According to Monastersky (2015), collectively humans now
shift more sediment through mining alone than all of Earth’s great rivers
combined. We have raised the sea levels, torn down the forests, bored through
entire mountains and now, after having (debatably) delayed a whole ICE AGE
through our impact on global temperature, the world supposedly lies on the
brink of what could be one of the greatest extinction events since that great
big meteor smashed the dinosaurs to smithereens.
That is, according to Thomas et al. (2004), who paint a very dystopian picture of the outlook
for Earth’s non-human residents. Thomas et al. calculate that, if climate
change trends carry on “business as usual”, we could see up to 52% of species
committed to extinction by 2050.
This, frankly, is a ridiculous estimation. To think that
half of the Earth’s fauna and flora could be committed to being wiped out by
the end of the next half century seems ludicrous. In fact, if you take Thomas et al.'s article and look closely, you can see that their methods are
absurdly simplistic, they ignore inter-species interactions and give no credit
to organisms’ natural propensity for adaptation. Yet still, as is so often the
case, there are truths to be found within the madness.
The climate IS changing. Flora and fauna ARE struggling. And
if change continues as it is then perhaps it is not too far-fetched to believe that
we may see many of our old favourites beginning to disappear in the decades to
come. Thomas et al's (2004) lower estimate of a minimum of 9% committed to
extinction (with minimal climate change) all of a sudden seems rather possible –
and scary.
This basically sums up the reaction I expect from all of you about this
You see, climate change is disrupting the lives of our planet’s
organisms in more ways than one. Their phenology (to the uninitiated -the
timing of seasonal activities of plants and animals) for a start is being
thrown completely off-kilter. Birds are migrating too early (or too late),
plants are blossoming prematurely and putting themselves at risk of sudden-death
by frost, and many synchronous relationships between organisms are being completely
thrown-off. Range-shifts are causing species to migrate poleward (a fact that
for many organisms with a selective niche can mean death), climate factors that
once held off nasty invasive species are no longer insurmountable barriers, and
the complex dynamics that kept ecosystems in balance are being completely torn
apart (Walther et al. 2002)*.
The ecosystem, frankly, is descending into crisis, and the
flora and fauna we have all come to know and love are in danger. Of course work
is being done to prevent extinctions, but the next Anthropocene related
extinction won’t be the first (Pounds et al. 1999) – or even the last.
It is important then to gain an understanding of just how
our precious organisms are being affected by human-induced climate change. If
we can ever hope to stop their demise, we must first come to understand it. I
hope then, that through this blog, and over the next few months, we can explore
together the intricacies of climate changes’ power-play over our organisms and
gain a new respect for those we share our only planet with. And maybe with a
little knowledge, who knows, we might even begin to see a little change.
*Walther et al.(2002) is a great read if you want some background into climate change’s
impacts on our flora and fauna, however if you would prefer something shorter
and sweeter, the guardian’s summarisation of the IPCC’s report on climate
change’s impacts on wildlife --- found here --- is a great place to start too.
Thanks for the IPCC summary link - it's a really great summary! I really enjoy your writing style!
ReplyDeleteGood start - I like that you are going to take a critical approach to evaluating future impacts on biodiversity.
ReplyDeleteTop tip: make sure though that the citation hyperlinks are not done through the UCL library but are direct to the article's abstract on the journal website. For example, I can't access Thomas et al. (2004) from home...